FANDOM


Psychokinesis (from the Greek ψυχή, "psyche", meaning mind, soul, heart, or breath; and κίνησις, "kinesis", meaning motion, movement; literally "mind-movement"),[1][2] also referred to as telekinesis[3] (Greek Template:Polytonic + Template:Polytonic, literally "distant-movement") with respect to strictly describing movement of matter, sometimes abbreviated PK and TK respectively, is a term coined by publisher Henry Holt[4] to refer to the direct influence of mind on a physical system that cannot be entirely accounted for by the mediation of any known physical energy (i.e. moving objects with the mind).[5]

Examples of psychokinesis could include distorting or moving an object,[6] and influencing the output of a random number generator.[5][7][8]


The study of phenomena said to be psychokinetic is part of parapsychology. Some psychokinesis researchers claim psychokinesis exists and deserves further study, although the focus of research has shifted away from large-scale phenomena to attempts to influence dice and then to random number generators.[9][10][11][12]


Most scientists believe that the existence of psychokinesis has not been convincingly demonstrated.[13] A meta-analysis of 380 studies in 2006 found a "very small" effect which could possibly be explained by publication bias.[11] PK experiments have historically been criticised for lack of proper controls and repeatability.[14][15][16] However, some experiments have created illusions of PK where none exists, and these illusions depend to an extent on the subject's prior belief in PK.[17][18]


TerminologyEdit

Early historyEdit

File:Edouard-Isidore-Buguet-PK-spirit-photographer.jpg

The term "Telekinesis" was coined in 1890 by Russian psychical researcher Alexander N. Aksakof (also spelled Aksakov).[20][21] The term "Psychokinesis" was coined in 1914[22] by American author-publisher Henry Holt in his book On the Cosmic Relations[23][24] and adopted by his friend, American parapsychologist J. B. Rhine in 1934 in connection with experiments to determine if a person could influence the outcome of falling dice.[25][26] Both concepts have been described by other terms, such as "remote influencing", "distant influencing"[27] "remote mental influence", "distant mental influence",[28] "directed conscious intention", " anomalous perturbation",[29] and "mind over matter."[30] Originally telekinesis was coined to refer to the movement of objects thought to be caused by ghosts of deceased persons, mischievous spirits, angels, demons, or other supernatural forces.[30] Later, when speculation increased that humans might be the source of the witnessed phenomena not caused by fraudulent mediums[31] and could possibly cause movement without any connection to a spiritualistic setting, such as in a darkened séance room, psychokinesis was added to the lexicon.[30] Eventually, psychokinesis became the term preferred by the parapsychological community.[25] Popular usage favours the word "telekinesis" to describe the paranormal movement of objects, perhaps due to the word's resemblance to other terms, such as telepathy and teleportation.Template:Citation needed


Modern usageEdit

As research entered the modern era, it became clear that many different, but related, abilities could be attributed to the wider description of psychokinesis and these, along with telekinesis, are now regarded as the specialties of PK. In the 2004 U.S. Air Force-sponsored research report Teleportation Physics Study, the physicist-author Eric Davis, PhD, described the distinction between PK and TK as "telekinesis is a form of PK."[32] The Oxford Dictionary of Psychology, 2009 edition, also defines psychokinesis in a wider sense as involving the "movement or change of physical objects," while its definition for telekinesis only describes "movement."[33] Psychokinesis, then, is the general term that can be used to describe a variety of complex mental force phenomena (including object movement) and telekinesis is used to refer only to the movement of objects, however tiny (a grain of salt, or air molecules to create wind)[34] or large (an automobile, building, or bridge).


Measurement and observationEdit

File:Poltergeist-Therese Selles.jpg

Parapsychology researchers describe two basic types of measurable and observable psychokinetic and telekinetic effects in experimental laboratory research and in case reports occurring outside of the laboratory.[28][30][35] Micro-PK (also micro-TK) is a very small effect, such as the manipulation of molecules, atoms,[28] subatomic particles,[28] etc., that can only be observed with scientific equipment. The words are abbreviations for micro-psychokinesis, micropsychokinesis[34] and micro-telekinesis, microtelekinesis. Macro-PK (also macro-TK) is a large-scale effect that can be seen with the unaided eye. The adjective phrases "microscopic-scale," "macroscopic- scale," "small-scale," and "large-scale" may also be used; for example, "a small-scale PK effect."


Spontaneous effectsEdit

Spontaneous movements of objects and other unexplained effects have been reported, and many parapsychologists believe these are possibly forms of psychokinesis/telekinesis.[25][30] Parapsychologist William G. Roll coined the term "recurrent spontaneous psychokinesis" (RSPK) in 1958.[36][37] The sudden movement of objects without deliberate intention in the presence or vicinity of one or more witnesses is thought by some to be related to as-yet-unknown PK/TK processes of the subconscious mind.[34] Researchers use the term "PK agent," especially in spontaneous cases, to describe someone who is suspected of being the source of the PK action.[34][38] Outbreaks of spontaneous movements or other effects, such as in a private home, and especially those involving violent or physiological effects, such as objects hitting people or scratches or other marks on the body, are sometimes investigated as poltergeist cases.[39]


Umbrella termEdit

Psychokinesis is the umbrella term for various related specialty abilities, which may include:

  • Telekinesis: movement of matter at the micro or macro (visible objects, life forms, etc.) levels; move, lift, agitate, vibrate, spin, bend, break, or impact)


Belief Edit

In September 2006, a survey about belief in various religious and paranormal topics conducted by phone and mail-in questionnaire polled Americans on their belief in telekinesis. Of these participants, 28% of male participants and 31% of female participants selected "agree" or "strongly agree" with the statement "It is possible to influence the world through the mind alone". There were 1,721 participants, and the poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 4%.[51]


In April 2008, British psychologist and skeptic Richard Wiseman published the results of an online survey he conducted entitled "Magicians and the Paranormal: A Survey," in which 400 magicians worldwide participated. For the question Do you believe that psychokinesis exists (i.e., that some people can, by paranormal means, apply a noticeable force to an object or alter its physical characteristics)?, the results were as follows: No 83.5%, Yes 9%, Uncertain 7.5%.[52]


Notable claimants of psychokinetic abilityEdit

Template:Category see also

File:Miroslaw-magola-wikipedia-3.jpg
File:Médium et Aksakof002.jpg
  • Martin Caidin (1927–1997), the author whose 1972 novel Cyborg was used as the basis for the television series The Six Million Dollar Man and The Bionic Woman, claimed to be able to cause movement by means of telekinesis in one or multiple small tabletop "energy wheels," also known as psi wheels beginning in the mid 1980s.[54][55][56] Parapsychologist Loyd Auerbach, a friend of Caidin's who sometimes accompanied him in demonstrations and workshops, reiterated a strong endorsement of him in his June 2004 Fate magazine column: "Martin Caidin was capable of moving things with his mind."[57] James Randi offered to test Caidin's claimed abilities in 1994.[58] In September 2004, Randi wrote: "He frantically avoided accepting my challenge by refusing even the simplest of proposed control protocols, but he never tired of running on about how I would not test him."[58]
  • Uri Geller (1946 – ), the Israeli famous for his spoon bending demonstrations, allegedly by PK.[30] Geller has been caught many times using sleight of hand[59] and according to author Terence Hines, all his effects have been recreated using conjuring tricks.[60]
  • Many of India's "godmen" have claimed macro-PK abilities and demonstrated apparently miraculous phenomena in public, although as more controls are put in place to prevent trickery, fewer phenomena are produced.[61]
  • Nina Kulagina (1926–1990), alleged Soviet psychic of the late 1960s and early 1970s who was filmed apparently performing telekinesis while seated in numerous black-and-white short films,[30][62][63] mentioned in the U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency report from 1978.[64]
  • Miroslaw Magola (1958 – ), alias "Magnetic Man," born in Poland and now living in Germany.[53] He claims he can lift objects off the floor, transport them through the air and force them to stick to his body - all using the power of his mind.[65] "I load myself with energy (I connect myself to it) and at the same time I wish for the object to raise" he says of his power.[65] On the UK television programme Beyond Belief in February 1996, he was unable to perform any levitation effects.[66] On the television show "Stan Lee's Superhumans" in September 2010 however, marked changes to Miroslaw Magola's brain waves, skin conductance and temperature were recorded during one of his demonstrations.[67] He was investigated by Dr. Friedbert Karger of the Max Planck Institute and Dr. David Lewis (psychologist), a neurophysiologist at MindLab, one of the United Kingdom's leading neuro-research centers and Dr. Konstantin Korotkov, professor of Physics at St. Petersburg State Technical University in Russia.[68][69] James Randi has tested similar "magnetic men" and women around the world and remains unconvinced the effect observed in Magola is related to psychokinesis.[65][66]
  • Matthew Manning (1955 – ) of the United Kingdom was the subject of laboratory research in the United States and England involving PK in the late 1970s and today claims healing powers.[30][31]
  • Eusapia Palladino (1854–1918; alternate spelling: Eusapia Paladino) was an Italian medium who allegedly could cause objects to move during seances and was endorsed by world famous magician Howard Thurston (1869–1936), who said he witnessed her levitation of a table.[70]
  • Felicia Parise, an American medical laboratory technician who allegedly was able to repeatedly demonstrate telekinetic movement of small objects beginning in the 1970s, in the first reported instance spontaneously, and then with practice by intense conscious intention. She said her inspiration for making the attempt was in viewing the black-and-white films of Nina Kulagina performing similar feats.[42] Some of the items Parise reportedly caused movement in were a plastic pill container, compass needle, and pieces of aluminum foil (the latter two under a bell jar filmed by a magician).[28] During the height of her fame in the early 1970s, the National Enquirer tabloid newspaper in the United States, then printed in all black and white, featured her in a large photo on its cover seated at a table attempting to perform telekinesis with the headline: "First American to Move Objects with the Mind." Parise eventually retired from performing telekinesis due to the physical stress on her body.[28]
  • Swami Rama (1925–1996), a yogi skilled in controlling his heart functions who was studied at the Menninger Foundation in the spring and fall of 1970, and was alleged by some observers at the foundation to have telekinetically moved a knitting needle twice from a distance of five feet.[71] Although Swami Rama wore a facemask and gown to prevent allegations that he moved the needle with his breath or body movements, and air vents in the room had been covered, at least one physician observer who was present at the time was not convinced and expressed the opinion that air movement was somehow the cause.[72]


Notable witnesses to PK eventsEdit

Alleged psychokinetic events have been witnessed by psychologists in the United States,[73][74][75] and elsewhere in the world by professionals with medical degrees,[75][76] physicists,[77]  electrical engineers,[74] military personnel,[78][79] police officers,[80]  and other professionals and ordinary citizens. Robert M. Schoch Ph.D., professor at Boston University, has written "I do believe that some psychokinesis is real" referring to the evidence for micro-psychokinesis obtained by the Princeton PEAR laboratory experiments and similar studies and some reports of macro-RSPK observed in poltergeist cases. He reports once seeing a book "jumping off a shelf" while in a room where a female psychokinesis agent was also present.[81] Best-selling author and medical doctor Michael Crichton described what he termed a "successful experience" with psychokinesis at a "spoon bending party" in his 1988 book Travels.[76] Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, author Dean Radin has reported that he, like Michael Crichton, was able to bend the bowl of a spoon over with unexplained ease of force with witnesses present at a different informal PK experiment gathering. He described his experience in his 2006 book Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality and online (with photos).[74] Author Michael Talbot (1953–1992) described a variety of spontaneous psychokinetic events he experienced and were witnessed by family and friends in two of his books, Beyond the Quantum and The Holographic Universe.


Remy Chauvin carried out a number of experiments to test psychokinesis, after one of the experiments because of the results, Chauvin came to believe that mind can influence matter.[82] Chauvin's experiment involved using an uranium isotope, a Geiger counter and several assistants. According to Andrew Tomas who wrote about one of his experiments:


Chauvin asked the experimenters to focus their thoughts during the first minute on accelerating radioactive disintegration, to concentrate on slowing it down by will power during the second minute and to turn off their thoughts for the third minute. The Geiger counter automatically stopped every minute, so when the results were checked, the participants of the test could hardly believe their eyes - they had actually succeeded in controlling isotopic disintegration by their concerted mental power.[83]


Anecdotes such as these - stories by eyewitnesses outside of controlled conditions - are considered insufficient evidence by the majority of scientists to establish the scientific validity of psychokinesis.[28][84]


PK PartiesEdit

"PK Parties" were a cultural fad in the 1980s, where groups of people were guided through rituals and chants to awaken metal-bending powers. They were encouraged to shout at the items of cutlery they had brought and to jump and scream to create an atmosphere of pandemonium (or what scientific investigators called heightened suggestibility). Critics were excluded and participants were told to avoid looking at their hands. Thousands of people attended these emotionally charged parties, and many became convinced that they had bent silverware by paranormal means.[85]


Scientific view Edit

If PK were to exist as claimed by some experimenters, it would violate some well-established laws of physics, including the inverse square law, the second law of thermodynamics and the conservation of momentum.[86][87] Hence scientists have demanded a high standard of evidence for PK, in line with Marcello Truzzi's dictum "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof".[15][88] When apparent PK can be produced in ordinary ways—by trickery, special effects or by poor experimental design—scientists accept that explanation as more parsimonious than to accept that the laws of physics should be rewritten.[28]


The late Carl Sagan included telekinesis in a long list of "offerings of pseudoscience and superstition" which "it would be foolish to accept (...) without solid scientific data" though even highly improbable claims may possibly be eventually verified. He placed the burden of proof on the proponents, but cautioned readers to "await—or, much better, to seek—supporting or disconfirming evidence" for claims that have not been resolved either way.[89] Physicist Richard Feynman advocated a similar position.[90]


In their 1991 research paper Biological Utilization of Quantum Nonlocality, Nobel Prize laureate Brian Josephson and coauthor Fotini Pallikara-Viras proposed that explanations for both psychokinesis and telepathy might be found in quantum physics.[91][92]


There is a broad consensus, including several proponents of parapsychology, that PK research, and parapsychology more generally, has not produced a reliable, repeatable demonstration.[13][15][93][94]


In 1984, the United States National Academy of Sciences, at the request of the US Army Research Institute, formed a scientific panel to assess the best evidence from 130 years of parapsychology. Part of its purpose was to investigate military applications of PK, for example to remotely jam or disrupt enemy weaponry. The panel heard from a variety of military staff who believed in PK and made visits to the PEAR laboratory and two other laboratories that had claimed positive results from micro-PK experiments.


The panel criticised macro-PK experiments for being open to deception by conjurors, and said that virtually all micro-PK experiments "depart from good scientific practice in a variety of ways". Their conclusion, published in a 1987 report, was that there was no scientific evidence for the existence of psychokinesis. Parapsychology advocates responded by accusing the panel of bias.[95]


Research with random number generators has been influenced by signal detection theory, viewing the effect of PK as weak but real "signal" hidden in the "noise" of experimental results. An effect too weak to be demonstrated in a replicable experiment would still show up as a statistically significant effect in a large set of data. To test this, parapsychologists have carried out meta-analyses of large data sets, with apparently impressive positive results.[96] This has in turn been criticized as an invalid use of meta-analysis, since the original studies are too dissimilar for the resulting statistics to be meaningful.[12] A 2006 meta-analysis of 380 studies found a small positive effect within the margin that could be explained by publication bias.[11]


Physicist Robert L. Park finds it suspicious that a phenomenon should only ever appear at the limits of detectability of questionable statistical techniques. He cites this feature as one of Irving Langmuir's indicators of pathological science. Park argues that if PK really existed it would be easily and unambiguously detectable, for example using modern microbalances which can detect tiny amounts of force.[94]


PK hypotheses are also tested implicitly in a number of contexts outside parapsychological experiments. Gardner considers a dice game played in casinos, where gamblers have a large incentive to affect the numbers that come up. This is in effect a large sample-size test of the same hypothesis as the J. B. Rhine dice experiments, but year after year the house takings are exactly those predicted by chance.[97] Psychologist Nicholas Humphrey argues that many experiments in psychology, biology or physics assume that the intentions of the subjects or experimenter do not physically distort the apparatus. Humphrey counts them as replications of PK experiments (but implicitly so) in which PK fails to appear.[15]


In the book Parapsychology: The Controversial Science (1991), British parapsychologist Richard S. Broughton, Ph.D, wrote of the differences of opinion among top scientists encountered by Robert G. Jahn, director of the (now-closed) PEAR laboratory, regarding the psychokinesis research that the lab was engaged in at the time.[28]


Explanations in terms of biasEdit

Cognitive bias research has been interpreted to argue that people are susceptible to illusions of PK. These include both the illusion that they themselves have the power, and that events they witness are real demonstrations of PK.[98] For example, Illusion of control is an illusory correlation between intention and external events, and believers in the paranormal have been shown to be more susceptible to this illusion than skeptics.[17][99] Psychologist Thomas Gilovich explains this as a biased interpretation of personal experience. For example, to someone in a dice game willing for a high score, high numbers can be interpreted as "success" and low numbers as "not enough concentration."[87] Bias towards belief in PK may be an example of the human tendency to see patterns where none exist, which believers are also more susceptible to.[98]


A 1952 study tested for experimenter's bias in a PK context. Richard Kaufman of Yale University gave subjects the task of trying to influence 8 dice and allowed them to record their own scores. They were secretly filmed, so their records could be checked for errors. The results in each case were random and provided no evidence for PK, but believers made errors that favoured the PK hypothesis, while disbelievers made opposite errors. A similar pattern of errors was found in J. B. Rhine's dice experiments which at that time were the strongest evidence for PK.[100]


Wiseman and Morris (1995) showed subjects an unedited videotape of a magician's performance in which a fork bent and eventually broke. Believers in the paranormal were significantly more likely to misinterpret the tape as a demonstration of PK, and were more likely to misremember crucial details of the presentation. This suggests that confirmation bias affects people's interpretation of PK demonstrations.[18] Psychologist Robert Sternberg cites confirmation bias as an explanation of why belief in psi phenomena persists, despite the lack of evidence: "[P]eople want to believe, and so they find ways to believe."[101]


Psychologist Daniel Wegner has argued that an introspection illusion contributes to belief in psychokinesis.[102] He observes that in everyday experience, intention (such as wanting to turn on a light) is followed by action (such as flicking a light switch) in a reliable way, but the underlying neural mechanisms are outside awareness. Hence though subjects may feel that they directly introspect their own free will, the experience of control is actually inferred from relations between the thought and the action. This theory of apparent mental causation acknowledges the influence of David Hume's view of the mind.[102] This process for detecting when one is responsible for an action is not totally reliable, and when it goes wrong there can be an illusion of control. This could happen when a external event follows, and is congruent with, a thought in someone's mind, without an actual causal link.[102]


As evidence, Wegner cites a series of experiments on magical thinking in which subjects were induced to think they had influenced external events. In one experiment, subjects watched a basketball player taking a series of free throws. When they were instructed to visualise him making his shots, they felt that they had contributed to his success.[103]


Magic and special effectsEdit

Template:See also


Magicians, sleight-of-hand-artists, etc., have successfully simulated some of the specialized abilities of PK (object movement, spoon bending, levitation, teleportation), but not all of the feats of claimed spontaneous and intentional psychokinesis have been reproduced under the same observed conditions as the original.[28] According to philosopher Robert Todd Carroll, there are many impressive magic tricks available to amateurs and professionals to simulate psychokinetic powers.[104] These can be purchased on the Internet from magic supply companies. Metal objects such as keys or cutlery can be bent by a number of different techniques, even if the performer has not had access to them beforehand.[105] Amateur-made videos alleging to show feats of psychokinesis, particularly spoon bending and the telekinetic movement of objects, can be found on video-sharing websites such as YouTube. Critics point out that it is now easier than ever for the average person to fake psychokinetic events and that without more concrete proof, the topic, apart from its enjoyment in fiction, will continue to remain controversial.[41]


The need for PK researchers to be aware of conjuring techniques was illustrated by events in the early 1980s. The McDonnell Laboratory for Psychical Research at Washington University reported a series of experiments in which two subjects had demonstrated PK phenomena (including metal-bending and causing images to appear on film) and other psychic powers under laboratory conditions. Magician James Randi revealed that the subjects were two of his associates, amateur conjurers Steve Shaw and Michael Edwards. The pair had created the effects by standard trickery, but the researchers, being unfamiliar with magic techniques, interpreted them as proof of PK. The laboratory closed not long after.[106]


Prize money for proof of psychokinesis Edit

Main article: List of prizes for evidence of the paranormal

Internationally, there are several individual skeptics of the paranormal and skeptics' organizations who offer cash prize money for demonstration of the existence of an extraordinary psychic power, such as psychokinesis. Experimental design must be agreed upon prior to execution, and additional conditions, such as a minimum level of fame, may be imposed. Prizes have been offered specifically for PK demonstrations, for example businessman Gerald Fleming's offer of £250,000 to Uri Geller if he can bend a spoon under controlled conditions.[107] These prizes remain uncollected by people claiming to possess paranormal abilities.


The James Randi Educational Foundation offers US$1,000,000 to anyone who has a demonstrated media profile as well as the support from some member of the academic community, and who can produce a paranormal event, such as psychokinesis, in a controlled, mutually agreed upon experiment.


In religion, mythology and popular cultureEdit

There are written accounts and oral legends of events fitting the description of psychokinesis dating back to early history, most notably in the stories found in various religions and mythology. In the Bible, for example, Jesus is described as transmuting water into wine, an act some have described as an example of psychokinesis,[108] healing the sick, and multiplying food.[109]


Mythological beings, such as witches, have been described as levitating people, animals, and objects.[110] The court wizard and prophet Merlin in the King Arthur legend, is said to have used his power to transport Stonehenge across the sea to England from Ireland.[111]


Psychokinesis has been an aspect in movies, television, computer games, literature, and other forms of popular culture, often presented as a superpower. An early example is the 1952 novella Telek by Jack Vance. Notable portrayals of psychokinetic characters include Sissy Spacek as a troubled high school student in the 1976 film Carrie, based on the Stephen King novel of the same name, and Ellen Burstyn in the healer-themed film Resurrection (1980).[112][113] Psychokinesis is also commonly used as a power in a large number of videogames and role playing games.



See alsoEdit

Template:Col-break

Template:Col-break

Template:Col-break

Template:Col-break

Template:Col-break


ReferencesEdit

  1. Template:Cite book
  2. Template:Cite book
  3. Template:Cite web
  4. Holt, Henry, On the Cosmic Relation - Book II- Part III, Psychokinesis, pp.216-217
  5. 5.0 5.1 Template:Cite web
  6. Template:Cite web
  7. Template:Cite book
  8. Template:Cite web
  9. Template:Cite web
  10. Template:Cite web
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Template:Cite journal
  12. 12.0 12.1 Template:Cite book
  13. 13.0 13.1 Template:Cite book
  14. Template:Cite journal
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Template:Cite book
  16. Template:Cite web
  17. 17.0 17.1 Template:Cite journal
  18. 18.0 18.1 Template:Cite journal
  19. Template:Cite web
  20. Template:Cite book Note: this quote as a cited reference can also be seen on page 722 in the multivolume "The Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition", 1989, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, ISBN 978-0-19-861229-2." The "M. Aksakof" is actually "A. Aksakof," as indicated in this 1896 quarterly journal Borderland
  21. Template:Cite web
  22. Template:Cite book
  23. Template:Cite web
  24. Template:Cite book
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 Template:Cite book
  26. Template:Cite web
  27. Template:Cite web
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 28.5 28.6 28.7 28.8 28.9 Template:Cite book
  29. Template:Cite web
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 30.5 30.6 30.7 Template:Cite book
  31. 31.0 31.1 Template:Cite book Page 1626, v. 12: entry on Matthew Manning.
  32. Template:Cite web
  33. Template:Cite book
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 34.4 Template:Cite book
  35. Template:Cite web
  36. Template:Cite book
  37. Template:Cite web
  38. Template:Cite book
  39. Template:Cite book
  40. Template:Cite book
  41. 41.0 41.1 Template:Cite book
  42. 42.0 42.1 42.2 42.3 42.4 42.5 42.6 Template:Cite book
  43. Template:Cite book
  44. Template:Cite book
  45. Template:Cite book
  46. Template:Cite book
  47. Template:Cite web
  48. Template:Cite book
  49. Template:Cite book
  50. Template:Cite book
  51. Study conducted by the Gallup Organization between October 8, 2005 and December 12, 2005 on behalf of the Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, of Waco, Texas, in the United States.
  52. Template:Cite web Published April 23, 2008.
  53. 53.0 53.1 Template:Cite web
  54. Template:Cite journal
  55. Template:Cite book
  56. Template:Cite book
  57. Template:Cite journal Monthly column "Psychic Frontiers"
  58. 58.0 58.1 Template:Cite web Online newsletter of the JREF.
  59. Template:Cite book
  60. Template:Cite book
  61. Template:Cite book chapters 6-8
  62. Template:Cite book
  63. Template:Cite book
  64. Template:Cite book
  65. 65.0 65.1 65.2 Template:Cite web Online newsletter of the JREF.
  66. 66.0 66.1 Template:Cite web Online newsletter of the JREF.
  67. Transcript of Miroslaw Magola investigation on "Stan Lee's Superhumans"
  68. Template:Cite web Translation of German magazine Mysteries.
  69. Template:Cite book
  70. Template:Cite book See endorsement quote by Thurston at Eusapia Palladino article. Text of entire book also available at google.books.com
  71. Template:Cite book
  72. Template:Cite webElmer Green's description of Swami Rama's alleged psychokinetic demonstration (with illustrations).
  73. Template:Cite book William G. Roll, Ph.D., and Jeannie Lagle (Masters degree) both state that they witnessed psychokinesis involving Tina Resch. Roll additionally reports numerous other cases he investigated.
  74. 74.0 74.1 74.2 Template:Cite web see also Dean
  75. 75.0 75.1 Template:Cite web
  76. 76.0 76.1 Template:Cite web See also spoonbending.html.
  77. Template:Cite bookJohn B. Hasted (1921-2002), Ph.D., Physics professor, University of London. In his book The Metal- Benders, he describes his research of psychokinesis claimants and psychokinesis events he personally witnessed.
  78. Template:Cite book"In 1979, a secret unit was established by the most gifted minds within the US Army. Defying all known accepted military practice—and indeed, the laws of physics—they believed that a soldier could adopt a cloak of invisibility, pass cleanly through walls, and, perhaps most chillingly, kill goats just by staring at them."; "Lenny from Special Forces disappeared into the room where the goat was. He came back and answered, with surprise and solemnity, "The goat is down.'"
  79. Template:Cite journal"In reality, Fort Bragg, by 1978, was already a hotbed of mind-war experimentation. Among the programs carried out at remote corners of the sprawling special operations base: the Goat Lab, where a team of New Age- trained Special Forces soldiers attempted to burst the hearts of goats, in an adjacent holding pen, through the power of psychic concentration." Article available online at http://www.uri-geller.com/articles/2005/august/eir.htm.
  80. Template:Cite book Two police officers witnessed alleged psychokinetic activity in the Resch home in the 1984 Columbus poltergeist case.
  81. Template:Cite journal
  82. Znanie-Sila magazine, No 9, 1967 U.S.S.R.
  83. Andrew Tomas, On the shores of endless worlds: the search for cosmic life, G. P. Putnamś Sons, 1974
  84. Template:Cite book
  85. Template:Cite book
  86. Template:Cite book
  87. 87.0 87.1 Template:Cite book
  88. Template:Cite book
  89. Template:Cite book
  90. Template:Cite book
  91. Template:Cite web Foundations in Physics, Vol. 21, pp. 197-207, 1991, Plenum Press, New York.
  92. Template:Cite book
  93. Template:Cite book
  94. 94.0 94.1 Template:Cite book
  95. Template:Cite book
  96. Template:Cite book
  97. Template:Cite book
  98. 98.0 98.1 Template:Cite journal
  99. Template:Cite journal
  100. Template:Cite book
  101. Template:Cite book
  102. 102.0 102.1 102.2 Template:Cite book
  103. Template:Cite journal
  104. Template:Cite book
  105. Template:Cite book
  106. Template:Cite book
  107. Template:Cite journal
  108. Template:Cite book
  109. Template:Cite book
  110. Template:Cite book
  111. Template:Cite book
  112. Template:Cite web
  113. Template:Cite web


Further readingEdit


Published Papers on PK / TKEdit


Military Papers on PK / TKEdit

  • Psychokinesis and Its Possible Implication to Warfare Strategy A 1985 study on potential military applications of psychokinesis by the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas USA. Listed at the U.S. Defense Technical Information Center's website and available to the public through the U.S. National Technical Information Service.
  • Teleportation Physics Study A study published in 2004 that reviews the current state research of real and hypothetical methods of teleportation. Includes a section titled PK phenomenon. Conducted by Eric Davis of Warp Drive Metrics, Nevada and sponsored by the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory at Edwards AFB, California. Available publicly on the Federation of American Scientists website.
  • New Correlation Between a Human Subject and a Quantum Mechanical Random Number Generator A 1967 study by Helmut Schmidt conducted at the Boeing Scientific Research Laboratory in Seattle, Washington USA that concluded: "From the results, it is tentatively concluded that there exists a weak but significant correlation between the statistical processes operative in these experiments and the experimenter who initiates the processes." Listed at the U.S. Defense Technical Information Center's website and available to the public through the U.S. National Technical Information Service.


External linksEdit


Template:Parapsychology Template:Pseudosciencear:تحريك عقلي az:Telekinez bg:Телекинеза ca:Telequinesi cs:Telekineze da:Psykokinese de:Telekinese et:Telekinees es:Telequinesis eu:Telekinesia fr:Psychokinèse hr:Psihokineza is:Hugmegin it:Psicocinesi he:טלקינזיס ka:ტელეკინეზისი mk:Телекинеза nl:Telekinese ja:念力 pl:Psychokineza pt:Telecinésia ro:Telechinezie ru:Телекинез scn:Psicucinési simple:Psychokinesis sk:Psychokinéza sr:Telekineza fi:Psykokinesia sv:Telekinesi tr:Telekinezi uk:Телекінез zh:念力

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.