FANDOM


Sasquatch
Bigfoot, also known as sasquatch, is an ape-like cryptid that purportedly inhabits forests, mainly in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Bigfoot is usually described as a large, hairy, bipedal humanoid. The term "sasquatch" is an anglicized derivative of the word "sésquac" which means "wild man" in a Salish Native American language.[1]


Scientists discount the existence of bigfoot and consider it to be a combination of folklore, misidentification, and hoax,[2] rather than a living animal, in part because of the large numbers thought necessary to maintain a breeding population.[3][4] A few scientists, such as Jane Goodall[5] and Jeffrey Meldrum, have expressed interest and belief in the creature, with Meldrum expressing the opinion that evidence collected of alleged Bigfoot encounters warrants further evaluation and testing.[6] Bigfoot remains one of the more famous examples of a cryptid within cryptozoology, and an enduring legend.


DescriptionEdit

Bigfoot is described in reports as a large hairy ape-like creature, ranging between Template:Convert tall, weighing in excess of Template:Convert, and covered in dark brown or dark reddish hair.[3][7] Alleged witnesses have described large eyes, a pronounced brow ridge, and a large, low-set forehead; the top of the head has been described as rounded and crested, similar to the sagittal crest of the male gorilla. Bigfoot is commonly reported to have a strong, unpleasant smell by those who claim to have encountered it.[8] The enormous footprints for which it is named have been as large as Template:Convert long and Template:Convert wide.[7] While most casts have five toes—like all known apes—some casts of alleged bigfoot tracks have had numbers ranging from two to six.[9] Some have also contained claw marks, making it likely that a portion came from known animals such as bears, which have five toes and claws.[10][11] Some proponents have also claimed that bigfoot is omnivorous and mainly nocturnal.[12]


HistoryEdit

Before 1958Edit

Wildmen stories are found among the indigenous population of the Pacific Northwest. The legends existed prior to a single name for the creature.[13] They differed in their details both regionally and between families in the same community. Similar stories of wildmen are found on every continent except Antarctica.[13] Ecologist Robert Michael Pyle argues that most cultures have human-like giants in their folk history: "We have this need for some larger-than-life creature."[14]


Members of the Lummi tell tales about Ts'emekwes, the local version of bigfoot. The stories are similar to each other in terms of the general descriptions of Ts'emekwes, but details about the creature's diet and activities differed between the stories of different families.[15]


Some regional versions contained more nefarious creatures. The stiyaha or kwi-kwiyai were a nocturnal race that children were told not to say the names of lest the monsters hear and come to carry off a person—sometimes to be killed.[16] In 1847, Paul Kane reported stories by the native people about skoocooms: a race of cannibalistic wild men living on the peak of Mount St. Helens.[10] The skoocooms appear to have been regarded as supernatural, rather than natural.[10]


Less menacing versions such as the one recorded by Reverend Elkanah Walker exist. In 1840, Walker, a Protestant missionary, recorded stories of giants among the Native Americans living in Spokane, Washington. The Indians claimed that these giants lived on and around the peaks of nearby mountains and stole salmon from the fishermen's nets.[17]


The local legends were combined together by J. W. Burns in a series of Canadian newspaper articles in the 1920s. Each language had its own name for the local version.[18] Many names meant something along the lines of "wild man" or "hairy man" although other names described common actions it was said to perform (e.g. eating clams).[19] Burns coined the term Sasquatch, which is from the Halkomelem sásq’ets (Template:IPA-sal),[20] and used it in his articles to describe a hypothetical single type of creature reflected in these various stories.[10][19][21] Burns's articles popularized both the legend and its new name, making it well known in western Canada before it gained popularity in the United States.[22]


After 1958Edit

In 1951, Eric Shipton had photographed what he described as a Yeti footprint.[22] This photograph generated considerable attention and the story of the Yeti entered into popular consciousness. The notoriety of ape-men grew over the decade, culminating in 1958 when large footprints were found in Del Norte County, California, by bulldozer operator Gerald Crew. Sets of large tracks appeared multiple times around a road-construction site in Bluff Creek. After not being taken seriously about what he was seeing, Crew brought in his friend, Bob Titmus, to cast the prints in plaster. The story was published in the Humboldt Times along with a photo of Crew holding one of the casts.[10] Locals had been calling the unseen track-maker "Big Foot" since the late summer, which Humboldt Times columnist Andrew Genzoli shortened to "Bigfoot" in his article.[23] Bigfoot gained international attention when the story was picked up by the Associated Press.[10][24] Following the death of Ray Wallace – a local logger – his family attributed the creation of the footprints to him.[3] The wife of Scoop Beal, the editor of the Humboldt Standard, which later combined with the Humboldt Times, in which Genzoli's story had appeared,[25] has stated that her husband was in on the hoax with Wallace.[26]


1958 was a watershed year for not just the bigfoot story itself but also the culture that surrounds it. The first bigfoot hunters began following the discovery of footprints at Bluff Creek, California. Within a year, Tom Slick, who had funded searches for Yeti in the Himalayas earlier in the decade, organized searches for bigfoot in the area around Bluff Creek.[27]


As Bigfoot has become better known and a phenomenon in popular culture, sightings have spread throughout North America. In addition to the Pacific Northwest, the Great Lakes region and the Southeastern United States have had many reports of Bigfoot sightings.[28]


Prominent reported sightingsEdit

File:Bigfoot Sightings in USA.png

About a third of all reports of Bigfoot sightings are concentrated in the Pacific Northwest, with most of the remaining reports spread throughout the rest of North America.[10][29][30] Some Bigfoot advocates, such as cryptozoologist John Willison Green, have postulated that Bigfoot is a worldwide phenomenon.[31] The most notable reports include:

  • 1924: Prospector Albert Ostman claimed to have been abducted by Sasquatch and held captive by the creatures in British Columbia.[32]
  • 1924: Fred Beck claimed that he and four other miners were attacked one night in July 1924, by several "apemen" throwing rocks at their cabin in an area later called Ape Canyon, Washington.[33] Beck said the miners shot and possibly killed at least one of the creatures, precipitating an attack on their cabin, during which the creatures bombarded the cabin with rocks and tried to break in. The supposed incident was widely reported at the time.[34] Beck wrote a book about the alleged event in 1967, in which he argued that the creatures were mystical beings from another dimension, claiming that he had experienced psychic premonitions and visions his entire life of which the apemen were only one component.[35] Speleologist William Halliday argued in 1983 that the story arose from an incident in which hikers from a nearby camp had thrown rocks into the canyon.[36] There are also local rumors that pranksters harassed the men and planted faked footprints.[10]
  • 1941: Jeannie Chapman and her children said they had escaped their home when a Template:Convert tall Sasquatch approached their residence in Ruby Creek, British Columbia.[37]
  • 1958: Bulldozer operator Jerry Crew took to a newspaper office a cast of one of the enormous footprints he and other workers had seen at an isolated work site at Bluff Creek, California. The crew was overseen by Wilbur L. Wallace, brother of Raymond L. Wallace. After Ray Wallace's death, his children came forward with a pair of Template:Convert wooden feet, which they said their father had used to fake the Bigfoot tracks in 1958.[3][10] Wallace is poorly regarded by many Bigfoot proponents. John Napier wrote, "I do not feel impressed with Mr. Wallace's story" regarding having over Template:Convert of film showing Bigfoot.[38]
  • 1967: Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin reported that on October 20 they had captured a purported Sasquatch on film at Bluff Creek, California. This came to be known as the Patterson-Gimlin film. Many years later, Bob Heironimus, an acquaintance of Patterson's, said that he had worn an ape costume for the making of the film.[10]
  • 2007: On September 16, 2007, hunter Rick Jacobs captured an image of a supposed Sasquatch by using an automatically triggered camera attached to a tree,[39] prompting a spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Game Commission to say that it was likely an image of "a bear with a severe case of mange."[40] The photo was taken near the town of Ridgway, Pennsylvania, in the Allegheny National Forest.[41][42]


Proposed explanations for sightingsEdit

Various types of creatures have been suggested to explain both the sightings and what type of creature Bigfoot would be if it existed. The scientific community typically attributes sightings to either hoaxes or misidentification of known animals and their tracks. While cryptozoologists generally explain Bigfoot as an unknown ape, some believers in Bigfoot attribute the phenomenon to UFOs or other paranormal causes.[43] A minority of proponents of a natural explanation have attributed Bigfoot to animals that are not apes such as the giant ground sloth.[44]


MisidentificationEdit

File:Croped BFRO image.jpg


In 2007, the Pennsylvania Game Commission said that photos the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization claimed showed a juvenile Bigfoot were most likely of a bear with mange.[41][46] Jeffrey Meldrum, on the other hand, said the limb proportions of the suspected juvenile in question were not bear-like, and stated that he felt they were "more like a chimpanzee."[47]


Hoaxes Edit

Both scientists and Bigfoot believers agree that many of the sightings are hoaxes or misidentified animals. Cryptozoologists Loren Coleman and Diane Stocking have estimated that as many as 70 to 80 percent of sightings are not real.[9]


Bigfoot sightings or footprints are often demonstrably hoaxes. Author Jerome Clark argues that the Jacko Affair, involving an 1884 newspaper report of an apelike creature captured in British Columbia, was a hoax. Citing research by John Green, who found that several contemporary British Columbia newspapers regarded the alleged capture as very dubious, Clark notes that the Mainland Guardian of New Westminster, British Columbia, wrote, "Absurdity is written on the face of it."[48]


On July 14, 2005, Tom Biscardi, a long-time Bigfoot enthusiast and CEO of Searching for Bigfoot Inc., appeared on the Coast to Coast AM paranormal radio show and announced that he was "98% sure that his group will be able to capture a Bigfoot which they have been tracking in the Happy Camp, California area."[49] A month later, Biscardi announced on the same radio show that he had access to a captured Bigfoot and was arranging a pay-per-view event for people to see it. Biscardi appeared on Coast to Coast AM again a few days later to announce that there was no captive Bigfoot. Biscardi blamed an unnamed woman for misleading him, and the show's audience for being gullible.[49]


On July 9, 2008, Rick Dyer and Matthew Whitton posted a video to YouTube claiming that they had discovered the body of a dead Sasquatch in a forest in northern Georgia. Tom Biscardi was contacted to investigate. Dyer and Whitton received $50,000 from Searching for Bigfoot, Inc., as a good faith gesture.[50] The story of the men's claims was covered by many major news networks, including BBC,[51] CNN,[52] ABC News,[53] and Fox News.[54] Soon after a press conference, the alleged Bigfoot body arrived in a block of ice in a freezer with the Searching for Bigfoot team. When the contents were thawed, it was discovered that the hair was not real, the head was hollow, and the feet were rubber.[55][56] Dyer and Whitton subsequently admitted it was a hoax after being confronted by Steve Kulls, executive director of Squatchdetective.com.[57]


GigantopithecusEdit

File:Gigantopithecus blacki.JPG

Bigfoot proponents Grover Krantz and Geoffrey Bourne believe that Bigfoot could be a relict population of Gigantopithecus. Bourne contends that as most Gigantopithecus fossils are found in China, and as many species of animals migrated across the Bering land bridge, it is not unreasonable to assume that Gigantopithecus might have as well.[58]


The Gigantopithecus hypothesis is generally considered entirely speculative. Gigantopithecus fossils are not found in the Americas. As the only recovered fossils are of mandibles and teeth, there is some uncertainty about Gigantopithecus's locomotion. Krantz has argued, based on his extrapolation of the shape of its mandible, that Gigantopithecus blacki could have been bipedal. However, the relevant part of mandible is not present in any fossils.[59] The mainstream view is that Gigantopithecus was quadrupedal, and it has been argued that Gigantopithecus's enormous mass would have made it difficult for it to adopt a bipedal gait.


Matt Cartmill presents another problem with the Gigantopithecus hypothesis: "The trouble with this account is that Gigantopithecus was not a hominin and maybe not even a crown-group hominoid; yet the physical evidence implies that Bigfoot is an upright biped with buttocks and a long, stout, permanently adducted hallux. These are hominin autapomorphies, not found in other mammals or other bipeds. It seems unlikely that Gigantopithecus would have evolved these uniquely hominin traits in parallel."[60]


Bernard G. Campbellin wrote: "That Gigantopithecus is in fact extinct has been questioned by those who believe it survives as the Yeti of the Himalayas and the Sasquatch of the north-west American coast. But the evidence for these creatures is not convincing."[61]


Extinct hominidae Edit

A species of Paranthropus, such as Paranthropus robustus, with its crested skull and bipedal gait, was suggested by primatologist John Napier and anthropologist Gordon Strasenburg as a possible candidate for Bigfoot's identity,[62] despite the fact that fossils of Paranthropus are found only in Africa.


Michael Rugg, of the Bigfoot Discovery Museum, presented a comparison between human, Gigantopithecus and Meganthropus skulls (reconstructions made by Grover Krantz) in episodes 131 and 132 of the Bigfoot Discovery Museum Show.[63] He favorably compares a modern tooth suspected of coming from a bigfoot to the Meganthropus fossil teeth, noting the worn enamel on the occlusal surface. The Meganthropus fossils originated from Asia, the tooth was found in the Pacific Northwest.


Some suggest Neanderthal, Homo erectus, or Homo heidelbergensis to be the creature, but no remains of any of those species have been found in the Americas.[64]


Scientific viewEdit

Template:Quote box


Template:See also The scientific community discounts the existence of Bigfoot, as there is no evidence supporting the survival of such a large, prehistoric ape-like creature. The evidence that does exist points more towards a hoax or delusion than to sightings of a genuine creature.[3] In a 1996 USA Today article titled "Bigfoot Merely Amuses Most Scientists", Washington State zoologist John Crane says, "There is no such thing as Bigfoot. No data other than material that's clearly been fabricated has ever been presented."[65] In addition to the lack of evidence, scientists cite the fact that Bigfoot is alleged to live in regions unusual for a large, nonhuman primate, i.e., temperate latitudes in the northern hemisphere; all recognized nonhuman apes are found in the tropics of Africa and Asia (although some smaller primates, such as Japanese macaques, are found in Asia up to the latitude of Northern California, and can cope with air temperatures to -20° C (-4° F)). Thus, as with other proposed megafauna cryptids, climate and food supply issues would make such a creature's survival in reported habitats unlikely.[66] Furthermore, great apes are not found in the fossil record in the Americas, and no Bigfoot remains have ever been found. Indeed, scientific consensus is that the breeding population of such an animal would be so large that it would account for many more purported sightings than currently occur, making the existence of such an animal an almost certain impossibility.[4]


A few scientists have been less skeptical about the claims of the existence of sasquatch. Jeffrey Meldrum characterizes the search for Sasquatch as "a valid scientific endeavor".Template:Citation needed and says that the fossil remains of an ancient giant ape called Gigantopithecus could turn out to be ancestors of today’s commonly known Bigfoot.[67] John Napier asserts that the scientific community's attitude towards Bigfoot stems primarily from insufficient evidence.[68] Other scientists who have shown varying degrees of interest in the legend are anthropologist David Daegling,[69] field biologist George Shaller,[65][70][71] Russell Mittermeier, Daris Swindler, Esteban Sarmiento,[72] and discredited racial anthropologist Carleton S. Coon.[73] Jane Goodall, in a September 27, 2002, interview on National Public Radio's "Science Friday", expressed her ideas about the existence of Bigfoot. First stating "I'm sure they exist", she later went on to say, chuckling, "Well, I'm a romantic, so I always wanted them to exist", and finally: "You know, why isn't there a body? I can't answer that, and maybe they don't exist, but I want them to."[74] However, the vast majority of evolutionary biologists, anthropologists and paleontologists completely dismiss the possibility of the existence of sasquatch.


Bigfoot organizationsEdit

There are several organizations dedicated to the research and investigation of Bigfoot sightings in the United States. The oldest and largest is the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization or "BFRO". The BFRO also provides a free database to individuals and other organizations. Their internet website includes reports from across North America that have been investigated by researchers to determine credibility.[75] Template:Wikinews

See also Edit

Template:Div col

Template:Div col end


Footnotes Edit

  1. Template:Cite web
  2. Template:Cite book
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Template:Cite web
  4. 4.0 4.1 Template:Cite web
  5. Template:Cite web
  6. Template:Cite web
  7. 7.0 7.1 Template:Cite encyclopedia
  8. Template:Cite web
  9. 9.0 9.1 Template:Cite web
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 Template:Cite web
  11. Bear signs, San Diego Natural History Museum.
  12. Template:Cite web
  13. 13.0 13.1 Daegling 2004, p. 28
  14. Template:Cite web
  15. Template:Cite journal
  16. Template:Cite web
  17. Template:Cite web
  18. See Template:Cite web for a list of names.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Template:Cite book
  20. Bright, William (2004). Native American Place Names of the United States. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pg. 422
  21. Template:Cite web
  22. Buhs, Joshua Blu, Bigfoot: The Life and Times of a Legend (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2009), 69, 75
  23. Template:Cite book
  24. Buhs, Joshua Blu, Bigfoot: The Life and Times of a Legend (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2009), 241
  25. Template:Cite news
  26. Daegling 2004, p. 35
  27. Template:Cite web
  28. Template:Cite web
  29. Template:Cite journal
  30. Template:Cite book
  31. [citation needed]
  32. Template:Cite web
  33. "Gorilla Seeahtik Indians and prospectors," Engineering and Mining Journal-Press, 16 Aug. 1924, p.242.
  34. Beck, Fred; told to Ronald A. Beck. (1967) I Fought The Apemen of Mount St. Helens, WA.
  35. Template:Cite book
  36. Template:Cite web
  37. Napier 1973, p. 89
  38. Template:Cite web
  39. Template:Cite web
  40. 41.0 41.1 Template:Cite news
  41. Template:Cite web
  42. Template:Cite web
  43. Daegling 2004, p. 20
  44. Template:Cite web
  45. Template:Cite web
  46. Template:Cite web
  47. Template:Cite book
  48. 49.0 49.1 Template:Cite web
  49. Template:Cite news
  50. Template:Cite news
  51. Template:Cite news
  52. Template:Cite news
  53. Template:Cite news
  54. Template:Cite news
  55. Template:Cite web
  56. Template:Cite news
  57. Template:Cite book
  58. Daegling 2004, p. 14
  59. Cartmill 2008, p. 117
  60. Template:Cite book
  61. Template:Cite web
  62. Template:Cite web
  63. Daegling 2004, p. 16
  64. 65.0 65.1 Template:Cite web
  65. Template:Cite bookTemplate:Sv icon
  66. Template:Cite book
  67. Template:Cite book
  68. Daegling 2004
  69. Template:Cite news
  70. Napier 1973, p. 197
  71. Template:Cite news
  72. Template:Cite book
  73. Template:Cite web
  74. Template:Cite book


Further reading Edit

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend


External links Edit

Template:Commons category


Template:Cryptozoologyar:بيغ فوت bg:Голямата стъпка ca:Peus grans cs:Bigfoot cy:Troedfawr da:Bigfoot de:Bigfoot es:Pie Grande eo:Saskvaĉo fa:پاگنده fr:Sasquatch ko:빅풋 hr:Bigfoot id:Bigfoot it:Big Foot he:ביגפוט hu:Nagylábú mk:Големото стапало nl:Bigfoot ja:ビッグフット no:Bigfoot pl:Wielka Stopa (zwierzę) pt:Pé-grande ru:Бигфут sco:Bigfit simple:Bigfoot sk:Bigfoot sr:Бигфут fi:Isojalka sv:Bigfoot tl:Bigfoot th:บิ๊กฟุต tr:Sasquatch zh:大腳

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.